The cyber security landscape has undergone a seismic shift. As organizations strive to embrace multi-cloud architectures, container-based applications and artificial intelligence, the traditional perimeter-based approach to security is becoming dangerously outdated.
What was once internal traffic in a secure data center now moves across public infrastructure, often without sufficient visibility or control. In this new reality, organizations are increasingly blind to the vulnerabilities of their cloud environments.
Many organizations struggle to integrate cloud firewalls into their broader security strategies. And many others struggle to monitor and protect east-west traffic (lateral traffic between cloud-based applications), creating significant vulnerabilities that attackers can exploit.
Perhaps most worryingly, many companies have virtually no control over their outbound traffic. This is the channel most commonly used by attackers to establish command and control communication within the organization and exploit it to extract data.
The growing attack surface
These gaps stem from a fundamental misunderstanding of where risk currently lies. Security models still based on the idea of a hardened outer layer cannot handle today’s atomized, dynamic and decentralized environments.
Every virtual private cloud (VPC), Kubernetes cluster, temporary container, and API endpoint now serves as a potential entry point.
This explosion of mini-perimeters means that what was once a single attack surface is now fragmented into thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of potential vulnerabilities.
The introduction of technologies such as infrastructure as code (IaC), artificial intelligence and containerization have brought speed and scalability to business environments. But it also exceeds the ability of many security teams to effectively monitor and control deployments.
The proliferation of employee-driven AI initiatives, often implemented outside of formal IT management, further complicates matters by creating data trails that escape traditional controls.
At the same time, multi-cloud strategies generate architectural complexity. Each cloud provider has unique tools, policies and configurations, forcing security teams to juggle inconsistent frameworks between environments.
This fragmentation creates blind spots, especially at communication points between workloads in different clouds, where consistent policy enforcement is nearly impossible.
What was once a clearly defined border has become a porous network of uncontrolled connections. In many cases, east-west traffic still benefits from implicit trust, although it plays an increasingly important role in enabling lateral movement during attacks.
Additionally, outbound traffic, the outbound path that workloads take to the Internet, is usually open by default.
For example, a virtual machine in Azure usually starts with unlimited outbound internet access. Internet access means that anyone with an Internet connection can find and interact with this workload.
These workloads allow attackers to lurk where they can patiently scan the environment, gain additional privileges, and move laterally to inject potentially dangerous malware or quietly recover data.
Rethink your cloud security framework
The traditional cybersecurity approach of building walls at the network edge is not applicable to enterprise cloud environments. Instead, organizations should adopt a model that integrates security directly into the fabric of the cloud network.
This holistic approach focuses on real communication paths between workloads, rather than mythical cloud perimeter defenses that are increasingly easy to bypass.
This new concept, developed by Aviatrix and called the Cloud Native Security Fabric (CNSF), reinterprets security as a distributed application layer that adapts to workloads and adapts to topological changes in real time.
More importantly, it systematically addresses the different generations of workloads typically found in enterprise environments: monolithic “virtual machine-connected” applications moving to the cloud, as well as modernized applications built with Kubernetes and serverless methods, which are much more efficient and short-lived.
The main principles of this approach include:
Safety on board: Application policies and controls are implemented within the infrastructure itself and are not enforced from an external network.
Dynamic segmentation: Security policies adapt to intent-based policies as workloads grow, shut down, or move.
Identity sensitive controls: Access decisions are based on the identity and context of the workload, even with encrypted communications.
Visibility and control of output: Outbound traffic to the Internet is inspected and controlled, closing a critical blind spot for data leaks.
Gentle application: Security mechanisms work in real time without hindering the speed of development.
This change does not mean abandoning existing security tools, but rather giving them access to parts of the environment they do not currently have. By integrating law enforcement into the cloud framework, information from monitoring tools can be translated into immediate, automated actions, bridging the gap between detection and response.
The way forward
The implications for enterprise security teams are clear: they will evolve or fall behind. Cloud environments require security models that are as scalable, dynamic and distributed as the workloads they support.
Organizations must move from protecting boundaries to protecting the connective tissue between departments.
This means:
– Prioritize monitoring and segmentation of east-west traffic.
– Eliminate implicit trust relationships between workloads in the cloud.
– Improve visibility and control in the departure area.
– Integrate application functions directly into the cloud infrastructure.
– Don’t think of security as a gatekeeper, but as a catalyst for speed and innovation.
The battlefield has shifted. The biggest threats are no longer around the corner; They hide among workloads and in uncontrolled outbound traffic that attackers exploit.
Companies that continue to rely on outdated models are not only falling behind; They ignore the risks that can affect them the most.
Check out our fact sheet on the best IT infrastructure management services.