Samsung Z Flip 5 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Ultimate Showdown

Samsung Z Flip 5 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, Will Samsung outshine Motorola in the foldable phone arena? Introducing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5:

Dimensions: 165.1 x 71.9 x 6.9mm (unfolded)
Weight: 187g
Display: 6.7-inch (1080 x 2640) 22:9 120Hz OLED (main screen)
Chipset: Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
RAM: 8GB
Storage: 256GB/512GB
Rear camera: 12MP (main) + 12MP (ultra-wide)
Front camera: 10MP
Battery: 3,700mAh
Charging: 25W wired, 15W wireless, 4.5W reverse wireless

The Galaxy Z Flip 5, Samsung’s first truly flat clamshell foldable, boasts a larger cover screen and outpaces its competitors in power.

Motorola Razr Plus / Razr 40 Ultra:

Dimensions: 170.8 x 74 x 7mm (unfolded)
Weight: 184.5g
Display: 6.9-inch (1080 x 2640) 22:9 165Hz OLED (main screen)
Chipset: Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
RAM: 8GB/12GB
Storage: 256GB/512GB
Rear camera: 12MP (main) + 13MP (ultra-wide)
Front camera: 32MP
Battery: 3,800mAh
Charging: 30W wired, 5W wireless

The Motorola Razr Plus competes with Samsung’s Flip, offering style and a large cover display. However, an older chipset and average camera performance undermine its standing.

Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip 5 enters the competitive foldable market against the formidable Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. While the Z Flip 4 impressed, the Razr 40 Ultra seems to outshine it in some aspects.

Now, let’s explore how the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 compares to the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra.

SAMSUNG GALAXY Z FLIP 5 VS MOTOROLA RAZR 40 ULTRA: SPECIFICATIONS

Features	Galaxy Z Flip 5	Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Display	6.7-inch OLED / 3.4-inch OLED	6.9-inch OLED / 3.6-inch OLED
Resolution	Front Camera	1080 x 2640 pixels / 1056 x 1066 pixels
Refresh rate	120Hz / 60Hz	165Hz / 144Hz
Chipset	Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy	Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
Rear cameras	12MP wide, 12MP ultra-wide	12MP wide, 13MP ultra-wide
Front camera	10MP	32MP
RAM	8GB (LPDDR5X)	8GB, 12GB (LPDDR5)
Storage	256GB, 512GB (UFS 4.0)	256GB, 512GB (UFS 3.1)
Battery	3,700mAh	3,800mAh

In the realm of specifications, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra engage in a head-to-head comparison. Let’s dissect the vital details.

SAMSUNG GALAXY Z FLIP 5 VS MOTOROLA RAZR 40 ULTRA: PRICING AND AVAILABILITY

The Galaxy Z Flip 5, unveiled on July 26 during the second major Samsung Galaxy Unpacked of 2023, hit the market on August 11.

While pricing remains stable across generations, the Flip 5 introduces revamped storage configurations. In the US, the baseline 256GB model retains last year’s Z Flip 4 pricing at $999.99, with the 512GB option at $1,119.99.

UK customers enjoy a £10 reduction compared to last year, paying £1,049 for the 256GB model and £1,149 for the 512GB variant. Australian pricing holds steady: AU$1,649 (256GB) and AU$1,849 (512GB).

For the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, released on June 5, 2023, the cost stands at $999.99 / £1,049.99 / AU$1,499 for the 8GB RAM and 256GB storage model. Samsung’s advantage lies in offering a broader range of storage choices, a feature we appreciate.

SAMSUNG GALAXY Z FLIP 5 VS MOTOROLA RAZR 40 ULTRA: DESIGN

In the realm of design, both the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra follow the clamshell foldable concept. They offer a traditional smartphone form that folds for enhanced portability.

Their dimensions closely align, with the Razr 40 Ultra’s slightly larger main screen adding a mere fraction to its overall size. Notably, the Razr 40 Ultra’s flush folding mechanism advantage over the Flip 4 disappeared with the Flip 5’s new ‘waterdrop’ hinge design.

In terms of external displays, the Razr 40 Ultra conceals its dual camera module, whereas Samsung opted for an L-shaped appearance to avoid camera interference. Preference leans towards Motorola’s approach.

While Motorola’s Viva Magenta finish stands out, Samsung offers a more subtle color palette—mint, graphite, cream, lavender, gray, blue, green, and yellow.

Samsung’s IPX8 rating and dust resistance, though uncertified, surpass the Razr 40 Ultra’s IP52 rating for water resistance but concede dust resistance.

In summary, design nuances set these foldables apart, catering to diverse user preferences.

SAMSUNG GALAXY Z FLIP 5 VS MOTOROLA RAZR 40 ULTRA: DISPLAY

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 front straight open

The Razr flaunts larger displays inside and out, a game-changer for added utility. Its 3.6-inch external display, at 1056×1066, supports full apps, a feature praised for basic tasks without unfolding the phone.

While the Galaxy Z Flip 5’s 3.4-inch 748×720 Flex Display is smaller and less sharp than the Razr’s, it offers expanded functionality. Despite Motorola’s leading in size, resolution, and refresh rate, the Flip excels in peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility.

Motorola’s advantage lies in seamlessly running apps on the Razr’s cover display, while the Flip requires adjustments to match this functionality. Display nuances set these foldables apart, each excelling in different aspects.

SAMSUNG GALAXY Z FLIP 5 VS MOTOROLA RAZR 40 ULTRA: CAMERAS

We labeled the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra’s camera setup as “the weakest link” despite its dual 12MP wide and 13MP ultra-wide sensors.

The Razr disappoints with subpar photos—blown-out colors, blurry zooms, and mediocre portraits. Conversely, the Galaxy Z Flip 5 mirrors the Flip 4’s camera setup, excelling with twin 12MP sensors.

Samsung’s prowess in camera tuning places the Flip 5 ahead, surpassing the Razr even before the Flip 5’s release. The Flip 5 introduces upgraded image processing and a reduced-glare lens for enhanced photography.

In the selfie realm, the Razr boasts a 32MP hole-punch camera, while the Flip 5 offers a 10MP equivalent. However, both phones allow the use of the main camera for selfies, where the Flip 5 triumphs again. Camera capabilities distinguish these foldable, with Samsung leading in imaging technology.

SAMSUNG GALAXY Z FLIP 5 VS MOTOROLA RAZR 40 ULTRA: PERFORMANCE

Samsung secures a clear lead in specs and performance with the Flip 5, housing Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset, outshining the Razr 40 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1.

While both chips impress, benchmarks decisively favor the Flip 5, barring unforeseen optimization issues. The RAM ties in at 8GB, but the Flip 5 utilizes faster and more efficient LPDDR5X memory.

Storage follows a similar trend, with the Flip featuring advanced UFS 4.0 storage in 256GB or 512GB, while the Razr typically offers 256GB. Samsung’s market dominance is evident in its superior third-party support.

Motorola, adhering closely to Google’s blueprint, introduces meaningful enhancements for the Razr 40 Ultra, notably external display widgets. Despite a user-friendly approach, third-party support is inconsistent, a challenge Google’s foldable-focused updates aim to alleviate.

Samsung’s commitment to updates surpasses Motorola’s, ensuring extended support and more timely updates. In the realm of performance, the Galaxy Z Flip 5 emerges as the stronger contender.

SAMSUNG GALAXY Z FLIP 5 VS MOTOROLA RAZR 40 ULTRA: BATTERY

The Galaxy Z Flip 5 retains its 3,700mAh battery, slightly smaller than the Razr 40 Ultra’s 3,800mAh. The significance lies in how both optimize hardware through software.

Previous Flip models and the Razr 40 Ultra barely achieve “all-day battery life.” The Flip 5, with a more efficient chipset, improves longevity, making all-day usage comfortable.

Charging speeds aren’t exceptional for either phone. The Razr 40 Ultra offers 30W wired and 5W wireless, while the Flip 5, sticking to the Flip 4 setup, provides slower 25W wired but faster 15W wireless. The difference is marginal.

SAMSUNG GALAXY Z FLIP 5 VS MOTOROLA RAZR 40 ULTRA: VERDICT

Motorola impressed with the Razr 40 Ultra, challenging Samsung’s dominance, especially in the US market. Despite Razr’s design appeal, Samsung reclaims the crown with feature parity and superior performance. While Razr excels in style, the Z Flip 5 emerges as the wiser long-term choice.